| 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2003シーズン分析(3) |
2003 Season Analysis (3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov.29,2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2003年のグリッドは、かなりバラエティに富んでいた。前年はPPがフェラーリとウィリアムズの2チームで独占されたが、今年はマクラーレンとルノーもPPを2回ずつ獲得した。特にルノーは前年に最高で6番手だったが、今年はフロントロー3回、2列目4回を記録した。また、前年に2列目までは3強が独占していたが、今年はザウバー、ジャガー、トヨタも食い込んだ。逆に、フェラーリが4列目に沈むことが5回もあった。 もちろん、混沌の最大の原因は今年の新ルールであろう。1ラップしかないアタックに加えて、レースの燃料を搭載しなければならなくなったことで、戦略の要素が加わった。その影響はどのくらいあったか、GPごとに見ていこう。 |
The grid in 2003 was
considerably rich in variety. In the previous year, PPs has
been monopolized in two teams, Ferrari and Williams. But in this year,
McLaren and Renault also gained PP by a unit of 2 times. Although
especially Renault was No. 6 in the highest in the previous year, three
front rows and 2 sequence 4 times were recorded this year. Moreover,
although about top 3 three monopolized Front 2 rows in the previous year,
Sauber, Jaguar and Toyota also ate away this year. Conversely, Ferrari
sometimes sank in 4th row no less than 5 times. Of course, the greatest cause of being confused may be a new rule of this year. In addition to the attack only with one lap, the strategic element was applied by it having had to come to carry the fuel of a race. It had the influence how much, or I will see it for every GP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final Qualify Top8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 燃料搭載量でPPが決まったGP マレーシア PPのアロンソは14周分の燃料を積んでいた。3番手Ｍ・シューマッハは1周目の事故で搭載量が不明。フェラーリは年間を通じて2台の搭載量が1周程度しかなく、バリチェロが22周だったことから、シューマッハが21周分は積んでいたと予想できる。それはアロンソより7周多く、20kgの重量差になり、0.6秒のハンディになる。アロンソとシューマッハの予選の差が0.349秒だったから、同じ燃料搭載量ならＭ・シューマッハがPPだった。 モナコ PPのＲ・シューマッハは21周分の燃料を積んでいた。2番手ライコネンは25周分と4周も多かった。それは0.2秒のハンディになり、予選タイム差の0.036秒より大きかった。また、トゥルーリやＭ・シューマッハも重い燃料を積んでいたが、全車が同じ重量だったら、ライコネンにはかなわなかったと見られる。同じ燃料搭載量ならライコネンがPPだった。 ヨーロッパ PPのライコネンは16周分の燃料を積んでいた。3番手Ｒ・シューマッハは21周分と5周も多かった。それは0.4秒のハンディになり、予選タイム差の0.096秒より大きかった。同じ燃料搭載量ならＲ・シューマッハがPPだった。 |
GPs it was decided in
the amount of fuel loading that PP would be Malaysia Alonso of PP was stacking the fuel for 14 laps. 3rd M.Schumacher has the unknown amount of loading by the accident of the 1st lap. Ferrari has the amount of loading of two sets only about 1 lap through every races, and since Barrichello was 22 laps, Schumacher can expect that the amount of 21 laps was stacking. There is much it 7 lap, it becomes a 20kg weight difference, and becomes the handicap for 0.6 seconds from Alonso. M.Schumacher was PP, if it was the same amount of fuel loading, since the difference of a qualifying of Alonso and Schumacher was 0.349 seconds. Monaco R.Schumacher of PP was stacking the fuel for 21 laps. A part for 25 laps and no less than 4 laps had many 2nd Raikkonen. It became the handicap for 0.2 seconds and was larger than 0.036 seconds of a qualifying time difference. Moreover, although Trulli and M.Schumacher were also stacking heavy fuel, it will be concluded that Raikkonen was not suited if all cars are the same weight. Raikkonen was PP if it was the same amount of fuel loading. Europe Raikkonen of PP was stacking the fuel for 16 lap. A part for 21 laps and no less than 5 laps had much 3rd R.Schumacher. It became the handicap for 0.4 seconds and was larger than 0.096 seconds of a qualifying time difference. R.Schumacher was PP if it was the same amount of fuel loading. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 燃料搭載量でPPがきわどかったGP ハンガリー PPのアロンソは13周分の燃料を積んでいた。2番手Ｒ・シューマッハは17周分と4周も多かった。それは0.3秒のハンディになり、予選タイム差の0.256秒ときわどい勝負になった。同じ燃料搭載量ならＲ・シューマッハがPPだった可能性もある。 イタリア PPのＭ・シューマッハは15周分の燃料を積んでいた。2番手モントーヤは16周分で1周多かった。それは0.1秒のハンディになり、予選タイム差の0.051秒ときわどい勝負になった。同じ燃料搭載量ならモントーヤがPPだった可能性もある。 |
GPs whose PP was
dangerous in the amount of fuel loading Hungary Alonso of PP was stacking the fuel for 13 lap. A part for 17 laps and no less than 4 laps had much 2nd R.Schumacher. It became the handicap for 0.3 seconds and became 0.256 seconds of a qualifying time difference, and the dangerous match. R.Schumacher may have been PP if it was the same amount of fuel loading. Italy M.Schumacher of PP was stacking the fuel for 15 laps. There was many 2nd Montoya 1 lap at a part for 16 laps. It became the handicap for 0.1 seconds and became 0.051 seconds of a qualifying time difference, and the dangerous match. Montoya may have been PP if it was the same amount of fuel loading. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 燃料搭載量がわからなくなったＧＰ オーストラリア 7周目のセーフティカーで各車ピットイン ブラジル 19周目のセーフティカーで各車ピットイン イギリス 6周目と12周目のセーフティカーで各車ピットイン ドイツ 1周目の事故で2番手Ｒ・シューマッハ、3番手バリチェロ、5番手ライコネンがリタイヤ。 日本 予選中の雨で路面状況が大きく変化 |
GPs which does not
understand the amount of fuel loading anymore Australia The safety car at the 7th lap and each car pit in. Brazil The safety car at the 19th lap, and each car pit in. Britain The safety car at the 6th lap and the 12th lap, and each car pit in. Germany The accident of the 1st lap and the 2nd R.Schumacher, 3rd Barrichello, and 5th Raikkonen were retired. Japan A road surface situation changes a lot with the rain under qualifying. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 燃料搭載量に関係ない文句なしのPP サンマリノ：Ｍ・シューマッハ スペイン：Ｍ・シューマッハ オーストリア：Ｍ・シューマッハ カナダ：Ｒ・シューマッハ フランス：Ｒ・シューマッハ アメリカ：ライコネン |
PPs without the
complaint which is not related to the amount of fuel loading San Marino: M.Schumacher Spain: M.Schumacher Austria: M.Schumacher Canada: R.Schumacher France: R.Schumacher USA: Raikkonen |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| こうして見ると、かなり燃料の影響は受けたように見える。だが、PPは取ったり取られたりで、各ドライバーの総数はさほど変わらないようにも見える。前半はフェラーリが速かったし、後半はウィリアムズが速かった。それはマシンの相対的な力関係の変化が現れた。新予選が実力をまったく無視してランダムになったとは言えないだろう。 下に前年の全GPトップ6グリッドを示す。前年がいかに固定的であったかがわかる。逆に言うと今年はルノーや下位チームが上位に入り込む余地が多くなった。そのために3強がレース中に詰まったり、オーバーテイクしたり、変化が多かった。 |
In this way, when it sees, the
influence of fuel seems to have received considerably. But, PP takes, or
is taken and the total of each driver seems not to change so much. Ferrari
was quick the first half and Williams was quick the second half. Change of
the power relationship with a machine relative appeared. New qualifying
completely disregards ability and could not say that it became random. All GP top 6 grid of the previous year is shown below. It turns out how the previous year was fixed. Conversely, when said, room for Renault and a low rank team to enter into a higher rank this year increased. Therefore, there was much change in getting about three blocked into races, or carrying out overtaking. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 Top6 Grid
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 新予選はレースを面白くすることに効果はあったのだ。前年までの予選の醍醐味がなくなったデメリットはあった。だが、それよりも主要なイベントである日曜のレースに活気を与えることになった。土曜の時点でわからない燃料搭載量は、ミステリー的要素となり、レースを読む材料にもなった。 2004年の予選も燃料搭載や1ラップは続く。これに対してチームからの反対はなかった。チームは、ルールは毎年変えるなと言っているだけだ。海外のニュースサイトやフォーラムを見ても、異議は見られない。 今一度なぜルールを変える必要があったのか考えてみる。F1が肥大化したのに反して人気は下火になった。視聴率低下・観客減・スポンサー撤収という事実は、主催者からすれば危機的状況である。カナダ、フランス、ブラジルなどが開催さえ危ぶまれるようになった。極端な話、日本でTV中継されなくなることだってありえるのだ。 資金の豊富なチームがグリッド上位を占め、レースも淡々と進む。チーム内にはオーダーさえ存在する。始まる前から結果が予想できてしまう。これでは誰も見なくなってしまう。それが2002年だった。 単にノスタルジーで昔は良かったから戻せというだけでは何も解決しない。むしろ、今後のF1はどうあるべきかを考えて改善していかなければならない。 |
The effect was for the new
qualifying to make a race interesting. There was a demerit whose enjoyment
of the qualifying by the previous year was lost. But, vigor will be given
to the race on Sunday which are events more nearly main than it. The
amount of fuel loading which is not known at the time on Saturday became
the mystery-element, and also became the material which reads a race. As for fuel loading and one lap, the qualifying in 2004 also continues. On the other hand, there was no contrary from teams. They only said that should not change the rule every year. An objection is not seen even if it sees an overseas news site and an overseas forum. It considers why the rule needed to be changed once again. It was unpopular on a decline against F1 having got fat. The fact of an audience rating fall, the decrease of a spectator, and sponsor recovery is a critical situation if it carries out from a sponsor. It came to be Canada, France, Brazil, etc. doubtful even of holding. It may be also stopping being carried out in the extreme talk and Japan for TV relay, or. The abundant teams of capital occupy a grid higher rank, and a race also progresses indifferently. Even an order exists in a team. A result will be able to be expected before starting. Now, nobody will come to see. It was it. Nothing is solved only by saying it was good at nostalgia a long time ago, return. Rather, it must consider how there should be F1 of future, and must improve. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2003シーズン分析(3) |
2003 Season Analysis (3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
