この記事を削除しますか？

記事に設定したパスワード（管理者なら管理パスワード）を入力して「削除」ボタンを押して下さい。 やめる場合は、そのまま「中止」ボタンを押して下さい。

記事 No.999 へのコメント

No.2889

Miles さん 　 ( ICQ=329467081、 メール、 ) 　 2022/05/21 (土) 01:51 I'm sorry, I didn't catch your name http://devinswany.com/stmap_54yebbug.html?levonorgestrel.renova.levitra differin cream uses Apologies to the author, but you cant have it both ways. Sandy Hook was used to further restrictions on weapons that have a pitiful amount of improper use (please look up the definition of an irrational fear, and your chances of being killed by a so-called assault rifle). The response to those proposed restrictions is what you find distasteful? If firearms were not made to be the defining issue of this tragedy, there would be no pro-gun rights folks feeling a need to defend their rights. Since it was, there is, and you can deal with the fallout. This may surprise you, but “gun-nuts” actually mourn murdered children too, and I resent you not allowing them the time to grieve for these children before threatening their beliefs. Fact is these tragedies are used for political benefit, with no real chance of saving lives. Shame on you.