(L) Long Beach, California (R) Golden Gate Bridge viewed from underneath,
San Francisco, California
California senate approves smoking ban for apartments.
The California senate has passed a proposal to ban smoking in apartments.
Anti-smoking act will
allow the landlords to prohibit smoking in their apartment buildings to
protect non-smoking
tenants from second hand smoke.However, the news report did not disclose
what punishment
would be meted out in case of violation.
The measure will strengthen previous anti-smoking measures that bar Californians
lighting up
in many public places, including playgrounds, concert halls, restaurants,
offices and some beaches.
The California Apartment Association, which represents about 50,000 property
owners, supports
the smoking ban. The Western Center on Law and Poverty (WCLP), an NGO working
among
low-income Californians, argued that the proposal discriminates against
the poor, the disabled
and people of color, who smoke and rent at higher rates than other segments
of the population.
Source: Los Angeles Times, May 31,2008
米国・カリフォルニア州で賃貸マンション内での喫煙を禁止 2007年10月、米国カルフォルニア州、
ベルモント市、カラバサス市で賃貸アパート、コンドミニアム内での喫煙を禁止する条例を可決した。
すでに入居している喫煙者は除外されるが、新規に建てられる15戸以上のアパート、マンション内で
の喫煙行為は禁止される。米国30州の公衆衛生局が防火、清掃コストの軽減を含め、経済性と健康の
両面から禁煙を勧めており、この５年間に数千のアパートやマンションが全面禁煙に踏み切っている。
今後、こうした規制は全米に拡大して行くとの予測もある。
引用 2007年10月 USA TODAY
カリフォルルニア州上院は、2008年5月31日、賃貸アパートでの喫煙行為を禁止する提案を可決した。
家主がアパートに居住する非喫煙者を有害なタバコ副流煙から守るために建物内での喫煙を禁止する
ことを正式に承認した。カリフォルニア・アパート協会加盟の約50,000の家主はこの法案に賛成して
いる。一方、有色人種の低所得層は、差別的な規制であると批判している。
Honolulu, Hawaii
Smoking ban in apartments and condominiums came in sight in Hawaii.
Now anti-smoking forces in Hawaii are setting their sights on apartments
and condos. The Coalition
for a Tobacco-Free Hawaii hopes to convince owners of residential rental
and condominium buildings
to prohibit smoking inside a private living area. The nonprofit group argues
second-hand smoke
emanating from the privacy of one unit may affect others when people live
in close quarters. As
laws like this become the norm, I think people are going to start thinking
about how, about where
we live," said H. Lee, University of Hawaii speech professor. The
state has already banned smoking
in restaurants, bars and within 20 feet of the entrances or windows of
smoke-free buildings.
Source: The Honolulu Advertiser.
米国・ハワイ州で賃貸マンション内での喫煙を禁止検討 ハワイ州でコンドミニアム居住空間での
喫煙禁止法案が浮上している。接近して居住する賃貸住宅では近隣の喫煙者からのタバコ副流煙
により健康を侵害される恐れがある。ハワイ大学のリー教授は「私たちはどこで、どのように暮らして
行くか考え始めている。賃貸物件内での喫煙禁止は火災の危険性を低下させ、清掃費用の軽減、
居住者間のトラブルの減少などいくつもの利点がある」と語る。しかし、こうした規制には全面賛成
する流れがあるものの、反対も少なくなく紆余曲折が予測される。
Crater Lake National Park, Oregon. Photographed in August 1962, by Dr. Junhaku Miyamoto.
Agencies ban smoking in Oregon.
The North Bend City and Coos-Curry Housing Authorities have adopted the
policy to ban smoking
in the apartments and buildings they own. It will go into effect March
2010. The Woodland Apartments
Preservation and Powers Housing Development adopted the policy to prohibit
smoking in the houses
for rent in October 2009. They will not be allowed to smoke inside the
units or other buildings owned
by the agencies. However, residents will be allowed to smoke outside their
units 10 feet from
the doors of neighbors.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development published a notice
in July, 2009, strongly
encouraging housing authorities adopt the policies to prohibit smoking
inside. The purpose of this
ordinance is to protect staff from second-hand smoke while working in the
units and to reduce costs
of preparing vacant units for leasing.
In the state of Oregon, the landlords have already banned smoking in about
40 percent of their rental units.
Source: Portland Press Herald and others.
米国では４０％の賃貸物件で喫煙を禁止 オレゴン州ではコンドミニアム居住空間での喫煙行為の禁止事項を
入居条件として家主が提示している。こうした賃貸不動産業界では物件内での喫煙行為を禁止する動きが
加速しており、米国政府当局も屋内での全面禁煙規制を強く推奨している。
Salt Lake City, Utah
Utah’s Smoke-free Apartment and Condominium
Apartment and condominium residents, managers, and owners can now breathe
easier. The Utah
Smoke-Free Apartment and Condominium Guide, an online resource, promotes
smoke-free housing
in Utah. Nationally, 50,000 people die each year as consequent on secondhand
smoke (SHS) exposure.
Additionally, hundreds of thousands of people exposed to it suffer various
other illnesses, such as
asthma and bronchitis.
ユタ州内では年間５万人の人が受動喫煙で死亡し、数十万人の人々が喘息や気管支炎を引き起こし
ている。最近の調査によると25,000人の子供たちが家のなかでタバコの煙による障害を受けている。
喫煙を禁止した住宅は火災の危険性も少なく、維持管理も容易である。保険料も安くなるなど、
メリットは大きい。最近ではユタ州を含め、米国27州で共同住宅無煙化の動きが加速して来ている。
For condominium associations, smoking ban hits home
Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, photographed in May 2008, by Dr. Junhaku Miyamoto.
As smoking restrictions become increasingly widespread, smokers find the
last place they can indulge
freely is at home. Perhaps not for long if that home is a condominium.
Associations are passing their
own bans, and some include living units as well as common areas. The 1418
N. Lake Shore Drive
Condominium Association in Chicago, recently amended its declaration to
prohibit smoking in the interior
inside the units.
The amendment was prompted by a desire to create a healthier environment
for residents and their guests
at the 28-unit high-rise, which was built in 1981 in Chicago. The owners
are very health-conscious in this
building, and smoking isn't healthy," she said. The association is
seeking certification as a "green building"
under the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) rating program
of the U.S. Green Building
Council. The vote to adopt the no-smoking amendment was nearly unanimous.
Smoke-free policies also
save money and lives by reducing cleaning and painting chores and by lowering
the risk of fire. . There are
two ways to impose a restriction. One is to amend the association's declaration;
the other is to pass a rule.
Reference: Chicago Tribune, October 01, 2010
喫煙規制は年々厳しくなる一方、自分の部屋のみが自由にタバコを吸える場所となっている。そうした中、
シカゴ市ミシガン湖畔の高層住宅でコンドミニアム内でも喫煙を規制する規則の改正作業が進んでいる。
こうした規則の修正は居住者および来訪者により良い環境を提供するために促進されており、コンドミニアム
協会のLEED（エネルギーおよび環境デザイン）全米ランキングプログラムのもとで行われている。全面禁煙と
することにより清掃塗装費用の削減をもたらし、火災の危険性を減少させる。こうした禁煙化には私的な
コンドミニアム規則改正によるものと条例による規制方法とがある。
Co-op & Condo Boards Consider Smoking Ban
It has become a hot-button real estate issue: many condos and co-ops considering a
vote to ban smoking
in their buildings. Some say it is a health issue, while others say it
is a violation of people's rights. However,
when your cigarette smoke goes into a neighbor's apartment, then you are
smoking in your neighbor's
apartment, and your neighbor has a right to not have second-hand smoke
taking place in their apartment.
If they cannot physically prevent the smoke from seeping into the units,
in that situation, banning to put
cigarettes may be the best way to protect residents' health and the building.
Many argue that it is not fair
for a building to tell people what they can do in their own homes. Nevertheless,
tenants knew that before
they moved in. It affects the market value as it's not normative in the
market. It can result in litigation,
which is costly to the building, and it makes potential purchasers suspect
as to what other kinds of rules
might be passed that could infringe on their privacy. While a board has
yet to pass a smoking ban, many
continue to discuss it.
Reference: May14, 2011, Jill Urban NY1 News
New Smoking Ban Proposal Targets Condos, Co-Ops
Some buildings don't want you to smoke in your own apartment.
At least half a dozen Manhattan condos and co-ops are considering a highly
controversial measure that
would make it illegal for individuals to smoke in their own apartments.
The co-op boards are expected
to raise the issue of smoke-free buildings before their shareholders at
meetings this spring, reports Wall
Street Journal. More co-ops are considering putting the matter to vote.
Such a proposal is in line
with the city's anti-smoking campaign, which has become increasingly aggressive
over the years. It
banned smoking in restaurants, then extended the ban to parks, pedestrian
plazas and public beaches.
The city has already banned smoking in public places in any building with
at least 10 units, but most
privately owned residential buildings have thus far refrained from imposing
an all-out smoking ban on
condo and co-op owners. Now, fueled in part by the city's efforts, fear
of potential smoking-related
lawsuits and increasing concern about the effects of second-hand smoke,
the long-standing rules may
be about to change. Despite the health benefits, some property owners aren't
enthusiastic about the
no-smoking proposal. Some fear it could decrease their property value.
Others, non-smokers included,
say such a rule would breach their constitutional right to privacy. Either
way, such a hotly debated
proposal faces roadblocks. More than two-thirds of all shareholders have
to vote to pass a proposal in
most co-ops, reports the Journal, and condos may call for at least a three-quarters
majority vote to
enact the ban.
Reference: NBC NEW YORK, Mar 16, 2011
（要旨）ニューヨークのレストランなどで始まった公共的空間での全面禁煙の流れは年ごとに強化されてており、
コンドミニアムなどの住居空間の禁煙化が討議されて来ている。それは住民の健康上、望ましいことであるが、
すべての共同住居での喫煙を禁止すると、プライバシーの侵害として訴訟の対象となることもあり得る。しかし、
同時に、居住者は近隣の人のタバコ有害煙によって健康を侵害されない権利も保有する。こうした中、建物の
所有者は必ずしも個人住宅空間内の全面禁煙に賛同していない。一方、居住者の4分の3は全面禁煙化に
賛成している。
Increasingly, Smoking Indoors Is Forbidden at Public Housing.
Tenement buildings in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, New York City
In January 2012, Maine will be the first state to ban smoking in public
housing in the country, in which
all of its public housing authorities are smoke-free, affecting about 12,000
tenants, after the model of
Auburn Housing Authority ( HA ), Maine, which became the authority to prohibit
smoking inside early
in 2004. Similar policies are being adopted with increasing frequency across
the country as cities move
aggressively to restrict smoking in more public places, from bars and restaurants
to parks, beaches and
vehicles. Boston will become the biggest city to ban smoking in its public
housing in coming September,
which serves about 25,000 tenants. Detroit, San Antonio and Portland, Oregon,
already have similar
restrictions in place. A smoking ban is largely a response to the risks
posed to nonsmokers by secondhand
smoke. In addition, property managers say smokeless apartments are cheaper
to clean, especially if there
is carpeting, and reduce the risk of fire.
Depending on who is asked, banning smoking in public housing is either
an effective way to promote
healthier living, as many officials and nonsmokers contend, or a violation
of individual liberties, as some
tenants argue. However, after several years of the ban, the objections
have gained no legal traction.
Smokers are not perceived as protected classes, and civil liberties groups
and legal aid societies say
they tend not to defend such cases. people. There are so many legitimate
issues that landlords can raise.
Housing officials point out that they do not require tenants to quit, only
to smoke outside, and they
often provide shelters for smokers. They also offer smoking-cessation programs,
although they say
few people attend. Many smokers just violate the ban and hope they avoid
getting caught, and are annoyed
when a neighbor reported him for smoking in his apartment. Smokers do not
like to go outside, especially
at night, because they are afraid of getting mugged and there are no security
cameras. Officials recognize
that a ban can be a burden for tenants, particularly because many are elderly
or disabled.
Secondhand smoke is an overwhelming public policy issue. Officials at various
housing authorities,
including the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development( HUD),
say they hear far more
complaints from nonsmokers about their neighbors, who smoke than from smokers
claiming the right to
light up cigarette.
The federal housing department says it is planning to gather information
next year on how various cities
have carried out their bans and will publish a report of best practices,
in the hope of encouraging more HA
to enact their own. In Los Angeles, a spokeswoman said the HA was conducting
a review and might consider
a ban. In New York City, a HA spokeswoman said it had in no position to
enforce a ban. One hand,
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has been one of the most aggressive advocates
of ridding smoke from
public spaces and clamping down on other health-related menaces like trans
fats. A spokeswoman at
the city health department said officials were reviewing the experiences
of other municipalities. The
federal department cited reports that secondhand smoke caused the deaths
of 50,000 nonsmokers
nationwide each year. In 2006, it said, smoking was responsible for more
than 18,000 apartment fires
that resulted in the deaths of 700 people, excluding firefighters, and
caused almost $500 million in
property damage.
It issued a second memorandum in September 2010 extending its recommendation
to other types of housing
by a local government, which provides housing vouchers to low-income families.
The New England Journal
of Medicine called for a complete smoking ban in any housing complex receiving
public found. However, HUD
is not likely to require a ban nationwide anytime soon. The director of
public housing programs for the agency,
said a mandate could result in evicting entire families, even if just one
person smoked. Most housing
authorities have long waiting lists, she said, and evictions would increase
homelessness, especially in a sour
economy. The experience in Maine suggests that evictions solely for smoking
violations are unusual. A concern
shifted to fairness to nonsmokers, and the dispensation for smokers was
revoked, prompting some to quit
the habit and some to move out. Still, questions of fairness persist because
those below the poverty line tend
to smoke more than those above it. Studies show that, on average, 30 percent
of people in public housing is
smokers, compared with 20 percent of the general population.
Reference: The New York Times December 17, 2011
公共住宅内での喫煙禁止への動き
（要旨）2012年1月からメイン州のすべての公共住宅が禁煙となる。米国全州のなかで初めての規制である。
9月には大都市、ボストンに及び、25，000戸がその対象となる。規制はさらにデトロイト、サンアントニオ、
オレゴン州のポートランドの公営住宅に及んでいる。こうした建物内の全面禁煙は健康的な生活を促すが、
一部のテナントから自由の侵害との声も出ている。HUD局長は、「全面禁煙となると、家族のうちの一人が
喫煙者であっても一家全員が公営住宅から退去せざるをえなくなる。公営住宅は空きを待っている人が
大勢いるため、一度退去すると特に現在のような経済情勢の下ではその一家はホームレス化する可能性が
大きい」とコメントしている。ニューヨーク住宅公社は、急速に法的規制を行う計画はないが,市保健局の
広報担当者は他の自治体での状況を参考として検討すると述べている。貧困ラインすれすれかそれ以下に
ある人たちの喫煙率は、一般人のそれよりは高いので、それへの配慮が必要となる。各種調査によると、
公営住宅居住者の喫煙率は30％であるのに対し、全人口の喫煙率は20％となっている。
Smoke-Free Environments Law Project
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
日本での取り組み
住宅でも高い受動喫煙リスク
先進国で行われている喫煙規制から除外されている場所に個人の住宅がある。しかし、ただ一人の喫煙行為
により、その家族、近隣住人への悪影響は計り知れない。産業医大健康開発科学研究室研究員の中田ゆりさん
は、同じ室内にいる乳児は喫煙者と同じ濃度の粉塵（ふんじん）にさらされ、親がベランダで喫煙して部屋に
戻っても乳児周辺の粉塵濃度が一時的に高まることを実際の測定で確かめた。
中田さんは、喫煙者の父親と生後７ヶ月の乳児がいるマンション室内で、タバコの煙の粉塵濃度を測定した。
同じ部屋で、父親が喫煙しながら、2メートル離れた乳児に話し掛けると、乳児の周辺の粉塵は、父親近くの
粉塵濃度とほぼ同じように増加した。濃度は１立方メートル当たり0.66ミリグラムに達し、厚生労働省が定める
室内基準の4.4倍に達した。喫煙後に窓を開けて換気しても室内の粉塵は一時間以上排出されず、部屋に
とどまっていた。マンションのベランダでタバコを吸うホタル族の父親が喫煙後に部屋に戻ると、親の呼気中の
煙が排出されて、話し掛けられた乳児の周囲の粉塵濃度が元の約2倍となり5〜6分間も高いまま維持された。
中田さんは「換気扇は有効でなく、屋内とベランダで完全に禁煙するしかない」と話している。
資料引用 2008年3月8日付熊本日日新聞
ベランダで喫煙した煙が隣室や上層階の吸排気装置に流れ込み、他人の吸う有害煙による受動喫煙の
被害も少なくない。吸ったタバコの火を投げ捨てて下層階の住民とトラブルを起こすケースも発生している。
火災を引き起こす危険性は常に存在する。こうした理由からも共同住宅での喫煙行為は禁止すべきで
あると思う。
金沢車両が全館禁煙マンションを着工
業務用ワゴンメーカーの金沢車輌（金沢市）は、社有地の有効活用を手始めに、事業の多角化と収益力
アップを目指す。その第一弾は全館禁煙を特徴にした賃貸マンションで、本社近くの旧駐車場で2008年8月
に着工した。完成は2009年1月。マンションは敷地230平方メートルで３階建て3棟の物件で、来館者を
含め全館禁煙とする。運営および管理は自社で行う。他の社有地について集合住宅や宅地開発など順次、
活用法を具体化させる方針である。小倉通成社長は「社有地で実績を積み、本格事業展開を目指す。
5年後をめどに、核事業の一つに育てたい」と話している。
資料引用 2008年9月17日付北陸中日新聞
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Total Smoking Ban in USA and Canada.
Smoke-free BC Canada ブリティシュ・コロンビア州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Public and Work places in Alberta アルバータ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Saskatchewan サスカチワン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Nonsmokers Health Protection Act, Manitoba マニトバ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoke-free Ontario Act オンタリオ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Tobaco Control in Quebec ケベック州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoke-free Places Act, New Brunswick ニューブランズウィク州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoke-free Places Act, Nova Scotia ノバスコシア州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in New Jersey ニュージャージー州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoke-free Illinois Act イリノイ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in California 1998・カリフォルニア州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Beverly Hills banned in all outdoor dining areas ビバリーヒルズではテラス席も禁煙
Smoking Ban in a condominium of California カリフォルニア州で賃貸住宅内の喫煙を禁止
Smoking Ban in the State of Washingtonワシントン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Oregon オレゴン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Montana passed statewide smoking Ban モンタナ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act コロラド州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Arizona アリゾナ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in the State of Maine メイン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Vermont バーモント州・ニューハンプシャー州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in the Ｍassachusetts state.マサチューセッツ州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in New York ニューヨーク州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Maryland メリーランド州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Washington,D.C.ワシントン市（ＤＣ）でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Minnesota ミネソタ州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Delaware デラウェア州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Ohio オハイオ州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Iowa アイオア州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Utah ユタ州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Rhode Island ロードアイランド州レストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Nevada ネバタ州レストラン、公共建物を全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Virginia タバコ産業の根拠地、バージニア州レストランを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Michigan ミシガン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
Smoking Ban in Wisconsin ウイスコンシン州でレストラン・バーを全面禁煙
2007年12月執筆 2008年4月加筆 2008年6月加筆 2008年9月加筆 2009年11月英文加筆 2011年12月加筆
禁煙席ネット主宰 宮本順伯 
★掲載写真および記事の著作権は宮本順伯に帰属
★「禁煙席ネット」へのリンクは自由
The report was written in December 2007 and added in December 2011, photographs
used in part of this article
were taken in August 1962, by Junhaku Miyamoto, MD, PhD.
